37 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
37 lines
3.4 KiB
Plaintext
capsule : this is a film that avoids easy answers .
|
|
wilhelm furtwangler , then the world's greatest orchestra conductor stayed in germany and cooperated with the nazis .
|
|
what were his views , was he a war criminal or a secret resistance fighter ?
|
|
how much did he know about crimes against humanity ?
|
|
the us government investigated him after the war and this film is a dramatization of that investigation .
|
|
, high +2 ( -4 to +4 )
|
|
in my opinion one of the best films of the last few years is istvan szabo's sunshine , a film that covers the fortunes of a jewish hungarian family under the reigns of three different regimes , hungarian aristocrats , nazis , and communists .
|
|
szabo's follow-up film , a german production , is much more limited in scope .
|
|
it is about the post-war investigation of who criminally supported the nazis and who opposed them .
|
|
ronald harwood's screenplay ambiguously looks at the investigation of a great classical music conductor who stayed on in germany when the nazis took power and became the most popular conductor of the third reich .
|
|
maj . steve arnold ( played by harvey keitel ) has been assigned by his superiors to investigate wilhelm furtwangler ( stellan skarsgard ) , perhaps europe's greatest classical music conductor .
|
|
when other artists fled germany , furtwangler remained behind and conducted for the hitler and his henchmen .
|
|
after the war is over arnold assigned to interview furtwangler and members of his orchestra and if appropriate to prosecute him for war crimes .
|
|
he secretly is told by his commanding officer to find furtwangler guilty .
|
|
from there we follow him and learn a little about arnold and something about furtwangler and his orchestra .
|
|
as he interviews members of the wartime orchestra arnold starts noticing odd peculiarities that may or may not point to a conspiracy against his investigation .
|
|
there is a certain sameness to the responses that he is getting .
|
|
perhaps any cooperation he is getting has been in some ways managed .
|
|
if so , perhaps he can never come to the truth .
|
|
in large part the film is about mind games that arnold uses to manipulate his interviewees and especially furtwangler .
|
|
where the script has problems is that in the end it is so ambiguous .
|
|
it has no obvious resolution and not much of a final act .
|
|
when it is over whether anything has been established is open to interpretation .
|
|
perhaps that is better than so many films that make it all to obvious what the audience should believe , but it is like watching a murder mystery and never finding out who the killer is .
|
|
we are given clues to something but they are never tied up .
|
|
in the end we just know more about both arnold and furtwangler .
|
|
the film is basically a stage play .
|
|
the visual is not very important .
|
|
corners are cut visually including touches like filling windows with photographs to avoid having to shoot on location .
|
|
as with a stage play , what this film centers on the dialog , and that is intriguing .
|
|
i rate the film an 8 on the 0 to 10 scale and a high +2 on the -4 to +4 scale .
|
|
[there is one piece of sloppiness few people but me would notice .
|
|
at one point we clearly see arnold's desk calendar say " jan 16 tues . "
|
|
a quick mental calculation told me that combination could occur in 1945 and then not again until 1951 .
|
|
the events had to take place in 1946 or 1947 .
|
|
a possible date could be obtained from any world almanac . ]
|