14 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
14 lines
1.7 KiB
Plaintext
this is the worst movie i've viewed so far in 98 .
|
|
the avengers = silly = man dressed in a bowler hat + woman wearing tight leathers > evil scientists dressed in teddy bear suits + greater evil , sir august de wynter wearing kilt .
|
|
the question is what could have gone wrong with a potentially great idea with big name cast ?
|
|
the same question was probably asked of last year's stinker batman and robin .
|
|
i feel the production got a little too smug , the script a little to smart and direction was somehow lost in the chaos of random events that collided together to form a movie .
|
|
my greatest criticism rests on the fact that there was no chemistry between emma peel and john steed ( thurman and fiennes ) ? something that was a vital element of the 60's tv serial of the same name .
|
|
the dialogue goes on and on about tea and other finer british perks , but does not allow much room for character development and interaction , except to perhaps grate on the viewer's nerves .
|
|
one wonders why the dynamic pair bother kissing in the end except for pure english formality .
|
|
connery as sir august , does not fair better than thurman or fiennes .
|
|
his dialogue is as erratic as stormy weather , mostly embarrassing and poor quality .
|
|
if there is a movie you would prefer never to see , i believe the avengers would be a good choice .
|
|
for one thing , you will not have to witness a product that is far inferior to the three high profile names that is associated with the title .
|
|
i cannot understand how something so poorly produced could have been released , but i put it down to one of those freak happenings in nature , like lightning you can't see it coming until it hits you .
|