16 lines
1.4 KiB
Plaintext

well , i'll admit when i first heard about this film ( which was before dante's peak ) i could just smell what 'twister' had started .
so now it seems that we're in a full fledged return to the '70's disaster film era .
with 'twister' , 'dante's peak' , 'volcano' and soon 'flood' and james cameron's extremly expensive 'titanic'
i'll say first off i enjoyed 'volcano' much more than i did 'dantes peak' .
part of that is just being biased as i usually enjoy anything that tommy lee jones appears in .
i've been reading a lot about the movie being 'cheezy' or 'hokey' and really didn't see or think that once during the entire film .
i get bored easily and this film didn't bore me for a minute .
another thing , and boy am i bitching today ! , that bothers me is when critics and such go on about " well thats not really possible . "
you know what ?
i couldn't give a bloody damn if it's possible or not , really i couldn't .
it's a freaking movie and i don't want reality thrown in my face .
i want to be able to see the impossible , the all might " what if " to many reviewers have seen one to many movies !
the special effects are the second star to this feature .
they are so amazing that i found it hard sometimes to believe they were indeed fx and la was was not burning to the ground .
they did an incredible job and come oscar time ( if they remember ) some notice better be thrown there way .